
Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 275W, a 220W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌37.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 275W vs 55W.
Radeon 8040S
2025Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 275W, a 220W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌37.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 275W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 8040S better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 Fury still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8040S and Radeon R9 Fury

Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8040S scores 9,756 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8040S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 8040S) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,756+2% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3584+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.734 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+180% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 224+250% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 4096-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8040S) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8040S draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 8040S) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-80% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 177.4+413% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8040S launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The Radeon 8040S costs 27.1% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon 8040S offers 41% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4+41% | 17.3 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Fiji |
| Release | January 6 2025 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #265 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













