
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+150.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 65.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,855 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon R9 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅+150.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 65.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 26.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,855 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon R9 390?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 45 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 390

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390
The Radeon R9 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,855 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 390's 8,855 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 150.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 390). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+150% | 8,855 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+297% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+821% | 0.63 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 390) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+40% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 390). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 390's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 275mm |
| Height | 112mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+242% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390 launched at $329. The Radeon R9 390 costs 34.1% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 26.9 (Radeon R9 390) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 65.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $329-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+65% | 26.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | Grenada |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #296 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












