
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 380X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 380X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 380X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 380X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 380X better than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS make more sense than Radeon R9 380X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and Radeon R9 380X
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,131+2% |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+29% | 970 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 380X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 27.4% advantage for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s+27% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 200.0+716% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($229 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 26.8 |
| Codename | — | Antigua |
| Release | October 26 2023 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #459 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













