Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
235.6% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 249.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 249.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
235.6% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 370 better than Radeon Pro 465?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,538 vs 4,722 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 370 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 465 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015 and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 370 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $149 MSRP. Radeon R9 370 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 370 is about $351 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 4.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 465 is the newer 2016 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 110W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro 465 make more sense than Radeon R9 370?

Yes. Radeon Pro 465 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 110W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 370. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 370 currently gives you 4.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 249.2%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 465 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 370 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	46 FPS	78 FPS
medium	28 FPS	66 FPS
high	20 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	30 FPS	69 FPS
medium	18 FPS	59 FPS
high	10 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	24 FPS
medium	7 FPS	23 FPS
high	4 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	13 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon R9 370

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	73 FPS	111 FPS
medium	45 FPS	82 FPS
high	32 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	35 FPS	63 FPS
medium	23 FPS	42 FPS
high	16 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	10 FPS	23 FPS
medium	7 FPS	16 FPS
high	6 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	8 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon R9 370

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	204 FPS	212 FPS
medium	163 FPS	170 FPS
high	136 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	159 FPS
medium	123 FPS	127 FPS
high	102 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	106 FPS
medium	82 FPS	85 FPS
high	68 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	53 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon R9 370

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
1080p
low	138 FPS	136 FPS
medium	107 FPS	109 FPS
high	87 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	100 FPS	99 FPS
medium	79 FPS	82 FPS
high	66 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	59 FPS	59 FPS
medium	45 FPS	45 FPS
high	35 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	25 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon R9 370

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon R9 370

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score	4,538	4,722+4%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.858 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock	907 MHz	975 MHz+7%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	64	80+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 465 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 103.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 370
TDP	35W-68%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	221mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	129.7+202%	42.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 370 costs 70.2% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 248.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).