
Radeon R9 285
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌47.3% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 285: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 285 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 190W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 285
2014Radeon RX 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 285: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 285 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 190W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌47.3% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌58.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 570 better than Radeon R9 285?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 285 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 and Radeon RX 570

Radeon R9 285
Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 285 scores 6,680 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,680 | 6,967+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.29 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+55% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 285 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 570) — a 27.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 570. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s | 224 GB/s+27% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 285) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 285 draws 190W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon RX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 221mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 120W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 221mm | 241mm |
| Height | 109mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.2 | 58.1+65% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 285 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 570 launched at $169. The Radeon RX 570 costs 32.1% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 offers 53.7% better value. The Radeon RX 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $169-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 41.2+54% |
| Codename | Tonga | Polaris 20 |
| Release | September 2 2014 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #365 | #356 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












