
Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌258.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 375W vs 200W.
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 375W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 375W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌258.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 375W vs 200W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7990 better than Radeon R9 280?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 280 make more sense than Radeon HD 7990?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7990 and Radeon R9 280

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7990 scores 5,566 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 933 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,566 | 5,532 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+22% | 3.344 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+7% | 933 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+14% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 3 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 1100.8% advantage for the Radeon HD 7990. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s x2+20% | 240 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2 | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7990 draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 7990) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 200W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 305mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.8 | 27.7+87% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon R9 280 costs 72.1% less ($720 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 offers 253.6% better value. The Radeon R9 280 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $279-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 19.8+254% |
| Codename | Malta | Tahiti |
| Release | April 24 2013 | March 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #412 | #415 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













