
Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌341.2% higher power demand at 375W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7990: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7990 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 375W, a 290W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7990
2013Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7990: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7990 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 375W, a 290W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌341.2% higher power demand at 375W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5300M better than Radeon HD 7990?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7990 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7990 and Radeon Pro 5300M

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 7990 scores 5,566 versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 5,853 — the Radeon Pro 5300M leads by 5.2%. The Radeon HD 7990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,566 | 5,853+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+28% | 3.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7990 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5300M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7990) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7990 draws 375W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 126.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 7990) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 85W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 350W-53% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.8 | 68.9+366% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | Malta | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 24 2013 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #412 | #403 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













