Radeon R9 270 vs FirePro W8000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4306

G3D Mark Score

4259

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 270 is 1.1% faster than FirePro W8000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon R9 270N/A

016GB32GB

VRAM data unavailable

FirePro W80004096 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

13%

low60%

medium20%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low30%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM · 4,259 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 270 performs 1.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon R9 270 and FirePro W8000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon R9 270 and FirePro W8000

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32

TMUs:80

Vram:null

L1 Cache:320 kB

L2 Cache:512 kB

Boost Clock:925 MHz

Shading Units:1280

Transistor Count:2,800 million

Texture Fill Rate:74.00

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt

Floating Point Performance:2.368 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference

Codename:Curacao

Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)

Launch Price:$179

Release Date:November 13 2013

Performance Ranking Position:476

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.