
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 8200 better than Tesla T10?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T10 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Tesla T10

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,615 | 12,558 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4608+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 | 288+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 12.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-12% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8+13% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 costs 50% less ($1001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 100% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-50% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6+100% | 6.3 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | TU102 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #210 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













