
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 230W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌187.5% higher power demand at 230W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 230W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌187.5% higher power demand at 230W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 8200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766+1% | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 3584+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 1500 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+230% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 96.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-65% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+191% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | TU104B | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #174 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












