GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

2025

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 8200 better than GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,615 vs 12,357 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is a 2025 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 8200 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $999 MSRP. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $999 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 230W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 8200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 230W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 8200. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 8200 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 8200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	166 FPS	163 FPS
medium	145 FPS	140 FPS
high	125 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	130 FPS
medium	118 FPS	108 FPS
high	99 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	50 FPS
medium	62 FPS	43 FPS
high	44 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	195 FPS	320 FPS
medium	150 FPS	277 FPS
high	105 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	209 FPS
medium	79 FPS	175 FPS
high	60 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	100 FPS
medium	39 FPS	81 FPS
high	32 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	556 FPS	568 FPS
medium	445 FPS	454 FPS
high	371 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	278 FPS	284 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	426 FPS
medium	334 FPS	341 FPS
high	278 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	213 FPS
4K
low	278 FPS	284 FPS
medium	222 FPS	227 FPS
high	185 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	142 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	438 FPS	323 FPS
medium	355 FPS	281 FPS
high	294 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	184 FPS
1440p
low	352 FPS	237 FPS
medium	280 FPS	214 FPS
high	212 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	165 FPS	143 FPS
medium	126 FPS	126 FPS
high	111 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	79 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) scores 12,357 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score	12,357	12,615+2%
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	GCN 5.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4608+29%	3584
Boost Clock	2520 MHz+68%	1500 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP	50W-78%	230W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	247.1+351%	54.8