GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1075 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

  • Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX TITAN X: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX TITAN X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX TITAN X better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,621 vs 12,615 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX TITAN X is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX TITAN X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $999 MSRP. GeForce GTX TITAN X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX TITAN X is in basically the same MSRP band at $999 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 0.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro WX 8200 make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN X?
Yes. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX TITAN X. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX TITAN X currently gives you 0.0% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low154 FPS163 FPS
medium133 FPS140 FPS
high112 FPS120 FPS
ultra69 FPS75 FPS
1440p
low124 FPS130 FPS
medium106 FPS108 FPS
high81 FPS85 FPS
ultra50 FPS53 FPS
4K
low42 FPS50 FPS
medium38 FPS43 FPS
high24 FPS31 FPS
ultra20 FPS27 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low187 FPS320 FPS
medium166 FPS277 FPS
high135 FPS213 FPS
ultra104 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low128 FPS209 FPS
medium104 FPS175 FPS
high82 FPS144 FPS
ultra62 FPS114 FPS
4K
low60 FPS100 FPS
medium50 FPS81 FPS
high46 FPS68 FPS
ultra37 FPS53 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low568 FPS568 FPS
medium454 FPS454 FPS
high379 FPS378 FPS
ultra284 FPS284 FPS
1440p
low426 FPS426 FPS
medium341 FPS341 FPS
high284 FPS284 FPS
ultra213 FPS213 FPS
4K
low284 FPS284 FPS
medium227 FPS227 FPS
high189 FPS189 FPS
ultra142 FPS142 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low235 FPS323 FPS
medium204 FPS281 FPS
high167 FPS244 FPS
ultra140 FPS184 FPS
1440p
low179 FPS237 FPS
medium157 FPS214 FPS
high125 FPS186 FPS
ultra102 FPS138 FPS
4K
low102 FPS143 FPS
medium83 FPS126 FPS
high67 FPS102 FPS
ultra53 FPS79 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score
12,621
12,615
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072
3584+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.691 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS+61%
Boost Clock
1075 MHz
1500 MHz+40%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
192
224+17%
L1 Cache
1.1 MB+25%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX
12 (FL 12_1)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder
NVENC 2nd gen
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd gen
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 8.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
TDP
250W
230W-8%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
83°C
80°C-4%
Perf/Watt
50.5
54.8+9%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 0% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP
$999
$999
Performance per Dollar
12.6
12.6
Codename
GM200
Vega 10
Release
March 17 2015
August 13 2018
Ranking
#209
#210