
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX TITAN X: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX TITAN X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX TITAN X: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX TITAN X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN X better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 8200 make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1500 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+25% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 8.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 230W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 54.8+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 0% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 12.6 |
| Codename | GM200 | Vega 10 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #209 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













