
Radeon 880M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅107.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Radeon 880M
2024Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅107.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 880M better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 880M and Radeon Pro WX 7100

Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+133% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 576 KB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 880M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 158.6% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+770% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 880M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Ellesmere |
| Release | July 15 2024 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #329 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












