
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
2018Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4200 Max-Q better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro WX 7100

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q scores 7,800 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,800+1% | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.82 TFLOPS+19% | 5.728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+19% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB+50% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.0+32% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GP104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 21 2018 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #234 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












