Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016Core: 1125 MHzBoost: 1201 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

T400

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 121.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$180 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

T400

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 117.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than T400?
Yes. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,682 vs 3,609 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a 2016 card with FSR upscaling, while T400 is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
T400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is about 121.7% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $180 MSRP, and you are getting 2.0% higher G3D Mark. T400 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does T400 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Yes. T400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (30W vs 50W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $180 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 4100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 4100 currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark. T400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
1080p
low41 FPS38 FPS
medium26 FPS26 FPS
high20 FPS17 FPS
ultra11 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low28 FPS24 FPS
medium17 FPS16 FPS
high10 FPS8 FPS
ultra5 FPS4 FPS
4K
low10 FPS9 FPS
medium7 FPS6 FPS
high4 FPS3 FPS
ultra3 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
1080p
low88 FPS51 FPS
medium57 FPS27 FPS
high43 FPS20 FPS
ultra24 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low42 FPS16 FPS
medium30 FPS10 FPS
high22 FPS7 FPS
ultra15 FPS5 FPS
4K
low11 FPS5 FPS
medium9 FPS3 FPS
high8 FPS3 FPS
ultra5 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
1080p
low166 FPS162 FPS
medium133 FPS130 FPS
high110 FPS108 FPS
ultra83 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low124 FPS122 FPS
medium99 FPS97 FPS
high83 FPS81 FPS
ultra62 FPS61 FPS
4K
low83 FPS81 FPS
medium66 FPS65 FPS
high55 FPS54 FPS
ultra41 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
1080p
low148 FPS162 FPS
medium115 FPS130 FPS
high94 FPS108 FPS
ultra78 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS117 FPS
medium85 FPS94 FPS
high70 FPS81 FPS
ultra56 FPS61 FPS
4K
low61 FPS69 FPS
medium47 FPS54 FPS
high36 FPS43 FPS
ultra26 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4100 and T400

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
G3D Mark Score
3,682+2%
3,609
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024+167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.46 TFLOPS+125%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1425 MHz+19%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the T400's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
73.6
120.3+63%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 MSRP, while the T400 launched at $180. The T400 costs 54.9% less ($219 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 20.1 (T400) — the T400 offers 118.5% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4100T400
MSRP
$399
$180-55%
Performance per Dollar
9.2
20.1+118%
Codename
Baffin
TU117
Release
November 10 2016
May 6 2021
Ranking
#526
#532