
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:

T400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌121.7% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$180 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌121.7% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$180 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than T400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T400 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4100 and T400

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
T400
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682+2% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS+125% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz | 1425 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the T400's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6 | 120.3+63% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 MSRP, while the T400 launched at $180. The T400 costs 54.9% less ($219 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 20.1 (T400) — the T400 offers 118.5% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $180-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 20.1+118% |
| Codename | Baffin | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #526 | #532 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













