
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M485X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M485X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 M485X
2016Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌12.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Radeon R9 M485X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M485X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌12.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M485X better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 4100 make more sense than Radeon R9 M485X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Radeon R9 M485X

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682 | 3,801+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6+384% | 15.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 11.3% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 9.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-11% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+10% | 8.4 |
| Codename | Baffin | Amethyst |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #526 | #519 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












