
Radeon HD 7970M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7970M
2012Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7970M
2012Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than Radeon HD 7970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7970M make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970M and Radeon Pro WX 4100

Radeon HD 7970M
Radeon HD 7970M
The Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,663 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7970M scores 3,663 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7970M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970M) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,663 | 3,682 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS | 2.46 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+25% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7970M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7970M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7970M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 36.6 | 73.6+101% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | Wimbledon | Baffin |
| Release | April 24 2012 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #531 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












