
Radeon 840M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Radeon 840M
2024Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 840M better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 4100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and Radeon Pro WX 4100

Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1024+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+141% | 1201 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 840M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+72% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Baffin |
| Release | June 2 2024 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #516 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












