
P104-100
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
P104-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
P104-100
2017Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than P104-100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does P104-100 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P104-100 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

P104-100
P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678 | 3,682 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+88% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+171% | 2.46 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+44% | 1201 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+181% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P104-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The P104-100 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 50% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+67% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The P104-100 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The P104-100 costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (P104-100) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The P104-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | P104-100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | Baffin |
| Release | December 12 2017 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #529 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












