
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅21.0% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1092.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌484.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅21.0% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1092.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌484.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 104.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+104% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+53% | 3840 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+93% | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+26% | 1967 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240 ×2+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60 ×2+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 864 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 280mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-50% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 280mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+308% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 82.9% less ($2900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1081.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-83% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+1082% | 3.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












