G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 80W instead of 400W, a 320W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌400% higher power demand at 400W vs 80W.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

2020

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 80W instead of 400W, a 320W reduction.

Why buy it

✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌400% higher power demand at 400W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 2% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $3,499 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $3,499 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low	111 FPS	173 FPS
medium	93 FPS	154 FPS
high	78 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	144 FPS
medium	79 FPS	117 FPS
high	59 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	39 FPS	91 FPS
medium	35 FPS	77 FPS
high	22 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low	252 FPS	579 FPS
medium	213 FPS	475 FPS
high	179 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	297 FPS
1440p
low	197 FPS	397 FPS
medium	163 FPS	326 FPS
high	137 FPS	263 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	115 FPS	159 FPS
medium	98 FPS	137 FPS
high	79 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	94 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low	605 FPS	593 FPS
medium	484 FPS	475 FPS
high	403 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	297 FPS
1440p
low	454 FPS	445 FPS
medium	363 FPS	356 FPS
high	302 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	302 FPS	297 FPS
medium	242 FPS	237 FPS
high	202 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	148 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low	247 FPS	593 FPS
medium	214 FPS	475 FPS
high	172 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	297 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	445 FPS
medium	167 FPS	356 FPS
high	131 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	297 FPS
medium	94 FPS	237 FPS
high	76 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	148 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 320 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score	13,444+2%	13,182
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560	3840 ×2+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.914 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS ×2+155%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	1967 MHz+70%
ROPs	64	96 ×2+50%
TMUs	160	240 ×2+50%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+233%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	40	60 ×2+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 145.5% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	352 GB/s	864 GB/s+145%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP	80W-80%	400W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	280mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	168.1+409%	33.0