
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 313.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 260W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅17.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌317.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 260W vs 200W.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 313.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 260W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅17.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌317.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 260W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7800 better than GeForce RTX 4070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 make more sense than Radeon PRO W7800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 732 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 27,180 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+31% | 4480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2525 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 184 | 280+52% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+190% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 70+52% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-23% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+29% | 104.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 76% less ($1900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 311.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-76% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+312% | 10.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












