G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
365.4% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,650 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 370.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,650 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 370.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
365.4% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than Radeon PRO W7700?

Yes. Quadro RTX A6000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 1.2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 48 GB vs 16 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX A6000 is about 365.4% more expensive on MSRP at $4,649 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 29.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (22,798 vs 23,062). Radeon PRO W7700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX A6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W7700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon PRO W7700 make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (190W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX A6000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX A6000 currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (22,798 vs 23,062) and 29.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon PRO W7700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX A6000 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	270 FPS	223 FPS
medium	250 FPS	205 FPS
high	209 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	257 FPS	201 FPS
medium	214 FPS	167 FPS
high	167 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	175 FPS	136 FPS
medium	144 FPS	114 FPS
high	104 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	84 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open Radeon PRO W7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	661 FPS	561 FPS
medium	555 FPS	462 FPS
high	420 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	369 FPS
medium	417 FPS	305 FPS
high	331 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	168 FPS
medium	220 FPS	138 FPS
high	188 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	91 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open Radeon PRO W7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	929 FPS	911 FPS
medium	759 FPS	741 FPS
high	675 FPS	644 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	716 FPS	704 FPS
medium	586 FPS	567 FPS
high	509 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	493 FPS	492 FPS
medium	408 FPS	395 FPS
high	342 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	259 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open Radeon PRO W7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	855 FPS	785 FPS
medium	784 FPS	653 FPS
high	684 FPS	591 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	679 FPS	622 FPS
medium	616 FPS	517 FPS
high	513 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	489 FPS	399 FPS
medium	410 FPS	346 FPS
high	342 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	259 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open Radeon PRO W7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon PRO W7700

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 23,062 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 336 Tensor cores.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
G3D Mark Score	22,798	23,062+1%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	10752+250%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	38.71 TFLOPS+21%	31.95 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1800 MHz	2600 MHz+44%
ROPs	112+17%	96
TMUs	336+75%	192
L1 Cache	10.5 MB+1300%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	84+75%	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX A6000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 77.8% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+200%	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s+78%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+100%	192-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 44.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	Radeon PRO W7700
TDP	300W	190W-37%
Recommended PSU	500W-9%	550W
Power Connector	8-pin EPS	1x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	76.0	121.4+60%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The Radeon PRO W7700 costs 78.5% less ($3650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 371.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W7700 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).