G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅98.1% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 63.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.

Radeon PRO W7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon PRO W7600

2023

Why buy it

✅98.1% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 63.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon PRO W7600?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 98.1% more FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 16,443 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO W7600 is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 63.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is in basically the same MSRP band at $599 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and you are getting 98.1% more estimated average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data and 63.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 63.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7600 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $599 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	183 FPS	129 FPS
medium	167 FPS	112 FPS
high	151 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	106 FPS
medium	124 FPS	87 FPS
high	110 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	48 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	49 FPS
medium	78 FPS	42 FPS
high	65 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO W7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	544 FPS	172 FPS
medium	454 FPS	143 FPS
high	353 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	120 FPS
medium	288 FPS	96 FPS
high	235 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	66 FPS
medium	144 FPS	54 FPS
high	125 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO W7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	884 FPS	740 FPS
medium	713 FPS	592 FPS
high	643 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	370 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	555 FPS
medium	549 FPS	444 FPS
high	483 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	277 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	370 FPS
medium	373 FPS	296 FPS
high	326 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	185 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO W7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	751 FPS	244 FPS
medium	612 FPS	210 FPS
high	536 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	187 FPS
medium	500 FPS	164 FPS
high	433 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	102 FPS
medium	324 FPS	84 FPS
high	301 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon PRO W7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon PRO W7600

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W7600

The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 63.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2440 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
G3D Mark Score	26,919+64%	16,443
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	5888+188%	2048
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+1%	2440 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184+44%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+125%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon PRO W7600
TDP	200W	130W-35%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	240mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	134.6+6%	126.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 63.3% better value.