
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅89.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 242mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅89.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 220W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 242mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7600 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon PRO W7600

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 34.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+35% | 16,443 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2440 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 51.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 130W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 126.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 16.7% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 61.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-17% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+61% | 27.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












