
GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅43.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅43.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7600 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 723 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 and Radeon PRO W7600

GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 scores 16,068 and the Radeon PRO W7600 reaches 16,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,068 | 16,443+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz | 2440 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 draws 175W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 29.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 130W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.8 | 126.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the Radeon PRO W7600 offers 2.6% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 27.5+3% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 17 2018 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #129 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













