
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅51.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 43.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌12% longer card at 242mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 242mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅51.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 43.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 242mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌12% longer card at 242mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 66.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+67% | 13,298 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+67% | 12.19 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+1% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+64% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 216mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 190.0+88% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 14% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 43.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $429-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+43% | 31.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












