
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design better than Radeon PRO W7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 454 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 320 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,444+1% | 13,298 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+106% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1700 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+43% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 13.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 70W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 216mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.1 | 190.0+13% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $429 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #188 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













