G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+30.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $5,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1856.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,413 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
1403.8% HIGHER MSRP
$6,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

✅+30.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $5,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1856.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,413 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
1403.8% HIGHER MSRP
$6,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W6900X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 30.1% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 30.1% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $5,601 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $6,000 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 30.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1856.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro W6900X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W6900X is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $6,000 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W6900X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	177 FPS	258 FPS
medium	162 FPS	235 FPS
high	142 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	242 FPS
medium	118 FPS	200 FPS
high	101 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	171 FPS
medium	79 FPS	143 FPS
high	66 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	425 FPS	564 FPS
medium	359 FPS	467 FPS
high	292 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	370 FPS
medium	229 FPS	303 FPS
high	186 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	195 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	160 FPS
medium	95 FPS	135 FPS
high	77 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	855 FPS	784 FPS
medium	693 FPS	627 FPS
high	609 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	588 FPS
medium	527 FPS	470 FPS
high	452 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	392 FPS
medium	355 FPS	313 FPS
high	308 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	196 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W6900X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	775 FPS	684 FPS
medium	639 FPS	565 FPS
high	558 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	561 FPS
medium	503 FPS	468 FPS
high	435 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	363 FPS
medium	322 FPS	313 FPS
high	298 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	196 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro W6900X

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W6900X

The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 17,413 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 30.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
G3D Mark Score	22,651+30%	17,413
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352	5120+18%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	22.02 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+18%	2150 MHz
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	136	320+135%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	80+135%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W6900X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6900X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W6900X
TDP	160W-47%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	120mm
Slots	2-50%	4
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+144%	58.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 93.3% less ($5601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1858.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).