
Radeon 8060S
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8060S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,200 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 674.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W6900X is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅110.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌650% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 22.5 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Radeon 8060S
2025Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,200 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 674.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅110.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W6900X is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌650% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 22.5 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 8060S better than Radeon Pro W6900X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W6900X make more sense than Radeon 8060S?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 88 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 196 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8060S and Radeon Pro W6900X

Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
The Radeon 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,989 points.

Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8060S scores 17,989 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8060S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon 8060S) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (Radeon 8060S) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon 8060S) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,989+3% | 17,413 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+35% | 2150 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 80+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8060S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System Shared vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8060S) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon 8060S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8060S) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8060S) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8060S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8060S draws 55W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 138% difference. The Radeon 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8060S) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-82% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 327.1+464% | 58.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8060S launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. The Radeon 8060S costs 86.7% less ($5200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.5 (Radeon 8060S) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon 8060S offers 675.9% better value. The Radeon 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800-87% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5+676% | 2.9 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #98 | #101 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












