G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

2021

Why buy it

✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (64 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌247.8% higher power demand at 400W vs 115W.

RTX A4000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 400W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 64 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

2021

RTX A4000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (64 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 400W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌247.8% higher power demand at 400W vs 115W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 64 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A4000 Mobile better than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo?

Yes. RTX A4000 Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 0.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 64 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A4000 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro W6800X Duo still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX A4000 Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro W6800X Duo still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon Pro W6800X Duo make more sense than RTX A4000 Mobile?

Yes. Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $4,999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A4000 Mobile. The trade-off is that RTX A4000 Mobile currently gives you 0.3% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon Pro W6800X Duo still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Benchmark Check

RTX A4000 Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	221 FPS	132 FPS
medium	203 FPS	114 FPS
high	178 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	106 FPS
medium	167 FPS	88 FPS
high	138 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	48 FPS
4K
low	135 FPS	47 FPS
medium	114 FPS	41 FPS
high	90 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	25 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	553 FPS	351 FPS
medium	463 FPS	303 FPS
high	380 FPS	252 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	214 FPS
1440p
low	376 FPS	251 FPS
medium	311 FPS	210 FPS
high	257 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	127 FPS
medium	138 FPS	108 FPS
high	117 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	71 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	663 FPS	665 FPS
medium	531 FPS	532 FPS
high	442 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	332 FPS	333 FPS
1440p
low	498 FPS	499 FPS
medium	398 FPS	399 FPS
high	332 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	249 FPS
4K
low	332 FPS	333 FPS
medium	265 FPS	266 FPS
high	221 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	166 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
1080p
low	646 FPS	292 FPS
medium	531 FPS	255 FPS
high	442 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	332 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	498 FPS	223 FPS
medium	398 FPS	201 FPS
high	332 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	332 FPS	132 FPS
medium	265 FPS	113 FPS
high	221 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	71 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Open RTX A4000 Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and RTX A4000 Mobile

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,742 points. Launch price was $4,999.

RTX A4000 Mobile

The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 14,742 and the RTX A4000 Mobile reaches 14,782 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1967 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 ×2 RT cores (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs 40 (RTX A4000 Mobile) vs 160.

Feature	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	14,742	14,782
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3840 ×2	5120+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS ×2	17.2 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	1967 MHz+17%	1680 MHz
ROPs	96 ×2+20%	80
TMUs	240 ×2+50%	160
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	5 MB+567%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60 ×2+50%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo comes with 64 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 Mobile has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	8+100%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (2x) (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (2x) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile).

Feature	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
Encoder	VCN 3.0 (2x)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 3.0 (2x)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo draws 400W versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 115W — a 110.7% difference. The RTX A4000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) vs 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro W6800X Duo	RTX A4000 Mobile
TDP	400W	115W-71%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	120mm	0mm
Slots	4	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	36.9	128.5+248%