G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

2023

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.

Why buy it

✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile better than Radeon PRO W6800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 2.1% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $2,249 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6800 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W6800 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon PRO W6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6800 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $2,249 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	160 FPS	222 FPS
medium	146 FPS	204 FPS
high	126 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	135 FPS	200 FPS
medium	113 FPS	167 FPS
high	95 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	129 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	135 FPS
medium	73 FPS	114 FPS
high	57 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	83 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W6800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	393 FPS	549 FPS
medium	339 FPS	468 FPS
high	275 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	259 FPS	372 FPS
medium	214 FPS	308 FPS
high	181 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	202 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	156 FPS
medium	106 FPS	134 FPS
high	89 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	90 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W6800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	811 FPS	912 FPS
medium	661 FPS	730 FPS
high	587 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	456 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	684 FPS
medium	499 FPS	547 FPS
high	435 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	396 FPS	456 FPS
medium	316 FPS	365 FPS
high	259 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	228 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W6800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	626 FPS	687 FPS
medium	546 FPS	558 FPS
high	471 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	435 FPS	449 FPS
1440p
low	525 FPS	574 FPS
medium	457 FPS	472 FPS
high	392 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	323 FPS	367 FPS
medium	291 FPS	316 FPS
high	270 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	228 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W6800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and Radeon PRO W6800

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.

Radeon PRO W6800

The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 20,702 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 144 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
G3D Mark Score	20,702+2%	20,270
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4608+20%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.62 TFLOPS	17.82 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	2320 MHz+37%
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	144	240+67%
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+500%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	36	60+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s	576 GB/s+125%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	6+500%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6800
TDP	115W-54%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	180.0+122%	81.1