
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+69.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌40.1% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅+69.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌40.1% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6600X make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 69.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+69% | 13,113 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+100% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2479 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 120W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 109.3+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 28.6% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 136.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-29% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+136% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












