
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅64.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌144.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 220W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅64.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 220W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌144.4% higher power demand at 220W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6600M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 11,407 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 94.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+94% | 11,407 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+179% | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2034 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+64% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 83.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 90W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 126.7+26% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #240 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












