
Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅14.8% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌399.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 375W vs 25W.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $799 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 399% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 375W, a 350W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅14.8% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $799 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 399% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 375W, a 350W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌399.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 375W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7990 better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6300 make more sense than Radeon HD 7990?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7990 and Radeon PRO W6300

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7990 scores 5,566 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,566 | 5,560 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+31% | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2040 MHz+104% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7990 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7990 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7990) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7990 draws 375W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 175% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 7990) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 25W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 350W-53% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.8 | 222.4+1403% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. The Radeon PRO W6300 costs 80% less ($799 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 396.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7990 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $200-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 27.8+396% |
| Codename | Malta | Navi 24 |
| Release | April 24 2013 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #412 | #413 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













