G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅54.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 222.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro W5700X

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
150.4% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro W5700X

2019

Why buy it

✅54.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 222.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
150.4% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W5700X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 54.9% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 17,591 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro W5700X is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 28.8% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 54.9% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 28.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 222.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro W5700X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700X is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
1080p
low	177 FPS	198 FPS
medium	162 FPS	182 FPS
high	142 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	183 FPS
medium	118 FPS	153 FPS
high	101 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	115 FPS
medium	79 FPS	96 FPS
high	66 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
1080p
low	425 FPS	254 FPS
medium	359 FPS	213 FPS
high	292 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	164 FPS
medium	229 FPS	139 FPS
high	186 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	81 FPS
medium	95 FPS	69 FPS
high	77 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
1080p
low	855 FPS	778 FPS
medium	693 FPS	624 FPS
high	609 FPS	528 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	396 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	594 FPS
medium	527 FPS	475 FPS
high	452 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	297 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	396 FPS
medium	355 FPS	314 FPS
high	308 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	198 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
1080p
low	775 FPS	390 FPS
medium	639 FPS	341 FPS
high	558 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	234 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	316 FPS
medium	503 FPS	276 FPS
high	435 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	179 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	197 FPS
medium	322 FPS	182 FPS
high	298 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	125 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5700X

The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 17,591 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 28.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
G3D Mark Score	22,651+29%	17,591
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352+89%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+135%	9.4 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+24%	2040 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	144+6%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	HEVC,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 24.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700X
TDP	160W-22%	205W
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	305mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2-50%	4
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+65%	85.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 222.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).