
Radeon 8060S
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8060S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W5700X is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅29.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌24.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 22.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
Radeon 8060S
2025Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.5 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅29.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W5700X is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌24.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 22.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 8060S better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5700X make more sense than Radeon 8060S?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8060S and Radeon Pro W5700X

Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S
The Radeon 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,989 points.

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8060S scores 17,989 and the Radeon Pro W5700X reaches 17,591 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8060S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon 8060S) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (Radeon 8060S) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,989+2% | 17,591 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+58% | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+42% | 2040 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8060S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System Shared vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8060S) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Radeon 8060S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8060S) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8060S) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8060S) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8060S draws 55W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 115.4% difference. The Radeon 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8060S) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 305mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-73% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 305mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 327.1+281% | 85.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8060S launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. The Radeon 8060S costs 19.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.5 (Radeon 8060S) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Radeon 8060S offers 27.8% better value. The Radeon 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800-20% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5+28% | 17.6 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #98 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












