G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 18W instead of 205W, a 187W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅5.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌1038.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 18W.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

2020

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 18W instead of 205W, a 187W reduction.

Why buy it

✅5.5% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌1038.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon Pro W5700 averages 5.5% more FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 14,832 vs 14,380 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, plus much lower power draw (18W vs 205W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 8 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro W5700 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $799 MSRP. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (18W vs 205W), and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $799 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	180 FPS	150 FPS
medium	164 FPS	132 FPS
high	139 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	166 FPS	127 FPS
medium	140 FPS	104 FPS
high	111 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	74 FPS
medium	86 FPS	62 FPS
high	59 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	41 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	183 FPS	226 FPS
medium	159 FPS	190 FPS
high	126 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	128 FPS	146 FPS
medium	107 FPS	122 FPS
high	85 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	78 FPS	78 FPS
medium	66 FPS	66 FPS
high	52 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	39 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	472 FPS	647 FPS
medium	395 FPS	518 FPS
high	302 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	330 FPS	485 FPS
medium	281 FPS	388 FPS
high	214 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	208 FPS	324 FPS
medium	182 FPS	259 FPS
high	125 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	162 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	389 FPS	332 FPS
medium	323 FPS	284 FPS
high	261 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	312 FPS	275 FPS
medium	253 FPS	236 FPS
high	188 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	147 FPS
medium	114 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	84 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro W5700

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) scores 14,832 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1930 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
G3D Mark Score	14,832+3%	14,380
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.037 TFLOPS	8.893 TFLOPS+193%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	1930 MHz+14%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) draws 18W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 167.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
TDP	18W-91%	205W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	824.0+1075%	70.1