
Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 425.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 425.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500X better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500X and Tesla M60

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the Radeon Pro W5500X leads by 5%. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351+5% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048 ×2+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+12% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+49% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128 ×2+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 5 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-58% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8+152% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Radeon Pro W5500X costs 80% less ($2401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Radeon Pro W5500X offers 434.8% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-80% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3+435% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #345 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












