
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 125W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌36.7% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 125W vs 100W.
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
2017Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 125W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌36.7% HIGHER MSRP$819 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 125W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4000 (móvel) better than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500X make more sense than Quadro P4000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro W5500X

Quadro P4000 (móvel)
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the Radeon Pro W5500X reaches 7,351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,500+2% | 7,351 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+17% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.398 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1757 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 5.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-20% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0+28% | 58.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 (móvel) launched at $819 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599. The Radeon Pro W5500X costs 26.9% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the Radeon Pro W5500X offers 33.7% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $819 | $599-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 12.3+34% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #326 | #345 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












