G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+45.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 700.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,597 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
451.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

✅+45.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 700.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,597 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
451.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega II?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 15,597 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro Vega II is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 45.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $1,800 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and you are getting 45.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 700.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro Vega II still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega II is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,199 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega II Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	177 FPS	145 FPS
medium	162 FPS	135 FPS
high	142 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	128 FPS
medium	118 FPS	109 FPS
high	101 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	60 FPS
medium	79 FPS	53 FPS
high	66 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega II

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	425 FPS	414 FPS
medium	359 FPS	348 FPS
high	292 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	258 FPS
medium	229 FPS	219 FPS
high	186 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	120 FPS
medium	95 FPS	99 FPS
high	77 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	64 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega II

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	855 FPS	687 FPS
medium	693 FPS	561 FPS
high	609 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	520 FPS
medium	527 FPS	421 FPS
high	452 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	263 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	315 FPS
medium	355 FPS	270 FPS
high	308 FPS	220 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	174 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega II

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	775 FPS	422 FPS
medium	639 FPS	353 FPS
high	558 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	313 FPS
medium	503 FPS	265 FPS
high	435 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	185 FPS
medium	322 FPS	166 FPS
high	298 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	117 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega II

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega II

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega II

The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 15,597 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 45.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
G3D Mark Score	22,651+45%	15,597
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.1
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352+6%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+57%	14.09 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+47%	1720 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	256+88%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	864 GB/s+200%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.1
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 99.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega II
TDP	160W-66%	475W
Recommended PSU	550W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	120mm
Slots	2-50%	4
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+332%	32.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 81.9% less ($1800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 700% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).