
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 475W, a 365W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌4.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$2,199 MSRP
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($2,199 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌331.8% higher power demand at 475W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 475W, a 365W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($2,199 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌4.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$2,199 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌331.8% higher power demand at 475W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega II better than Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega II?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 117 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro Vega II

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,372 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) scores 15,372 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 9.492 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,372 | 15,597+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.492 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1720 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 124.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-77% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.7+326% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) launched at $2299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199. The Radeon Pro Vega II costs 4.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the Radeon Pro Vega II offers 6% better value.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | $2199-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 7.1+6% |
| Codename | TU104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #181 | #138 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












