
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅61.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,000 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1681.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1002.5% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅61.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,000 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1681.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1002.5% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 110 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 14,018 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 61.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+62% | 14,018 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+6% | 4096 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+57% | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+47% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 256 ×2+88% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+330% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 864 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.1 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.2 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 99.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-66% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+380% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 90.9% less ($4000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1675% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-91% | $4399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+1675% | 3.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | Vega 20 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #59 | #170 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












