G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅4.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,099 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1399.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1366.3% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

2019

Why buy it

✅4.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,099 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1399.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1366.3% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile better than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile averages 4.8% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,332 vs 14,018 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is about $4,099 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $4,399 MSRP, and you are getting 4.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.2% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $300 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (50W vs 475W), and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $4,399 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
1080p
low	136 FPS	114 FPS
medium	120 FPS	104 FPS
high	105 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	76 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	101 FPS
medium	99 FPS	86 FPS
high	84 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	54 FPS
medium	59 FPS	47 FPS
high	42 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
1080p
low	296 FPS	381 FPS
medium	245 FPS	326 FPS
high	188 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	246 FPS
medium	166 FPS	212 FPS
high	137 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	143 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	114 FPS
medium	87 FPS	96 FPS
high	75 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
1080p
low	645 FPS	538 FPS
medium	516 FPS	459 FPS
high	430 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	315 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	417 FPS
medium	373 FPS	350 FPS
high	316 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	237 FPS
4K
low	321 FPS	261 FPS
medium	258 FPS	216 FPS
high	200 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	136 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
1080p
low	484 FPS	386 FPS
medium	424 FPS	317 FPS
high	360 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	234 FPS
1440p
low	402 FPS	292 FPS
medium	351 FPS	245 FPS
high	285 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	175 FPS
4K
low	240 FPS	172 FPS
medium	203 FPS	153 FPS
high	185 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	110 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Open Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 14,332 and the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo reaches 14,018 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
G3D Mark Score	14,332+2%	14,018
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.1
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560	4096 ×2+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	14.09 TFLOPS ×2+57%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+2%	1720 MHz
ROPs	48	64 ×2+33%
TMUs	80	256 ×2+220%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+150%	1 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — a 350% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	864 GB/s+350%
Bus Width	96-bit	384-bit+300%
L2 Cache	12 MB+200%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	8+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.1 (2x)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.2 (2x)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 161.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
TDP	50W-89%	475W
Recommended PSU	500W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Mobile	Integrated
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	120mm
Slots	0-100%	4
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	286.6+872%	29.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile costs 93.2% less ($4099 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) vs 3.2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 1393.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).