
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅111.6% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 639.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌267.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅111.6% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 639.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌267.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 13,369 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 101.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+101% | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+44% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+142% | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+69% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 256+39% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+480% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+152% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 72.8% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 636.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-73% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+636% | 6.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #32 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












