G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+75.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,891 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
50.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅+75.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,891 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
50.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 12,891 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 75.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $200 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and you are getting 75.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 163.8%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 64 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $599 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 64 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	177 FPS	106 FPS
medium	162 FPS	96 FPS
high	142 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	94 FPS
medium	118 FPS	81 FPS
high	101 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	47 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	425 FPS	301 FPS
medium	359 FPS	262 FPS
high	292 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	204 FPS
medium	229 FPS	175 FPS
high	186 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	100 FPS
medium	95 FPS	84 FPS
high	77 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	855 FPS	580 FPS
medium	693 FPS	464 FPS
high	609 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	290 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	435 FPS
medium	527 FPS	348 FPS
high	452 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	290 FPS
medium	355 FPS	232 FPS
high	308 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	145 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
1080p
low	775 FPS	258 FPS
medium	639 FPS	213 FPS
high	558 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	196 FPS
medium	503 FPS	162 FPS
high	435 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	118 FPS
medium	322 FPS	105 FPS
high	298 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	70 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro Vega 64

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 64

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 12,891 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 75.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
G3D Mark Score	22,651+76%	12,891
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+6%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+99%	11.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+88%	1350 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	256+88%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro Vega 64
TDP	160W-36%	250W
Recommended PSU	550W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+174%	51.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 33.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 164.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).