Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

2024Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017Core: 1138 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

  • 56.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 158W instead of 210W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 401.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 405.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 32.9% higher power demand at 210W vs 158W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO V710 better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Yes. Radeon PRO V710 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO V710 averages 56.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 12,000 vs 12,104 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO V710 is a 2024 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO V710 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO V710 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon PRO V710 is about 401.3% more expensive on MSRP at $2,000 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 56.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (12,000 vs 12,104). Radeon Pro Vega 56 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM, 12,104 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low174 FPS95 FPS
medium155 FPS82 FPS
high136 FPS70 FPS
ultra115 FPS48 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS79 FPS
medium117 FPS68 FPS
high102 FPS53 FPS
ultra93 FPS36 FPS
4K
low90 FPS31 FPS
medium76 FPS28 FPS
high61 FPS22 FPS
ultra53 FPS19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low508 FPS267 FPS
medium416 FPS227 FPS
high329 FPS178 FPS
ultra270 FPS144 FPS
1440p
low341 FPS189 FPS
medium277 FPS162 FPS
high230 FPS132 FPS
ultra191 FPS105 FPS
4K
low161 FPS100 FPS
medium135 FPS83 FPS
high115 FPS71 FPS
ultra91 FPS55 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low540 FPS485 FPS
medium432 FPS417 FPS
high360 FPS363 FPS
ultra270 FPS272 FPS
1440p
low405 FPS386 FPS
medium324 FPS327 FPS
high270 FPS272 FPS
ultra202 FPS204 FPS
4K
low270 FPS245 FPS
medium216 FPS202 FPS
high180 FPS160 FPS
ultra135 FPS123 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low540 FPS176 FPS
medium432 FPS144 FPS
high360 FPS123 FPS
ultra270 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low405 FPS127 FPS
medium324 FPS107 FPS
high270 FPS92 FPS
ultra202 FPS78 FPS
4K
low270 FPS73 FPS
medium216 FPS61 FPS
high180 FPS47 FPS
ultra135 FPS37 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon Pro Vega 56

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
12,000
12,104
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3456
3584+4%
Compute (TFLOPS)
27.65 TFLOPS+209%
8.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+60%
1250 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
216
224+4%
L1 Cache
768 KB
896 KB+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO V710 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The Radeon PRO V710 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 28.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
TDP
158W-25%
210W
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
75.9+32%
57.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 80% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 405% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP
$2000
$399-80%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
30.3+405%
Codename
Navi 32
Vega 10
Release
October 3 2024
August 14 2017
Ranking
#196
#222