
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅56.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 210W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 405.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌32.9% higher power demand at 210W vs 158W.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅56.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 210W, a 52W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 405.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌32.9% higher power demand at 210W vs 158W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 123 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon Pro Vega 56

Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000 | 12,104 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456 | 3584+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+209% | 8.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+60% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 216 | 224+4% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The Radeon PRO V710 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 28.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-25% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9+32% | 57.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 80% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 405% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $399-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 30.3+405% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #196 | #222 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













