G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+122.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,104 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅+122.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,104 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 12,104 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 122.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 50.1% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 122.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega 56 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM, 12,104 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 56 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	183 FPS	95 FPS
medium	167 FPS	82 FPS
high	151 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	79 FPS
medium	124 FPS	68 FPS
high	110 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	31 FPS
medium	78 FPS	28 FPS
high	65 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	544 FPS	267 FPS
medium	454 FPS	227 FPS
high	353 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	189 FPS
medium	288 FPS	162 FPS
high	235 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	105 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	100 FPS
medium	144 FPS	83 FPS
high	125 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	884 FPS	485 FPS
medium	713 FPS	417 FPS
high	643 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	386 FPS
medium	549 FPS	327 FPS
high	483 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	204 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	245 FPS
medium	373 FPS	202 FPS
high	326 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	123 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	751 FPS	176 FPS
medium	612 FPS	144 FPS
high	536 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	127 FPS
medium	500 FPS	107 FPS
high	433 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	73 FPS
medium	324 FPS	61 FPS
high	301 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon Pro Vega 56

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 12,104 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 122.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
G3D Mark Score	26,919+122%	12,104
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	5888+64%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+225%	8.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz+98%	1250 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184	224+22%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+559%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB+800%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCE 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon Pro Vega 56
TDP	200W-5%	210W
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	304mm	267mm
Height	137mm	111mm
Slots	3	2-33%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	134.6+134%	57.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 33.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 48.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).