
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+83.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 46.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,104 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅+83.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 46.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,104 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 123 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro Vega 56

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 12,104 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 83.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+83% | 12,104 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+127% | 8.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+38% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+559% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 4.7% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 210W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+75% | 57.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 20% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 46.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $399-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+47% | 30.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #222 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












