FirePro S9050 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro S9050 better than Radeon Pro Vega 16?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,901 vs 4,809 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro S9050 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S9050 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro S9050 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $1,999 MSRP. FirePro S9050 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro S9050 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $1,999 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (75W vs 225W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro Vega 16 make more sense than FirePro S9050?
Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 16 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 225W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro S9050. The trade-off is that FirePro S9050 currently gives you 1.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low104 FPS79 FPS
medium89 FPS68 FPS
high73 FPS55 FPS
ultra43 FPS36 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS70 FPS
medium80 FPS60 FPS
high58 FPS43 FPS
ultra33 FPS28 FPS
4K
low29 FPS25 FPS
medium27 FPS23 FPS
high18 FPS15 FPS
ultra16 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low140 FPS111 FPS
medium108 FPS82 FPS
high86 FPS63 FPS
ultra59 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS63 FPS
medium56 FPS43 FPS
high42 FPS31 FPS
ultra31 FPS21 FPS
4K
low29 FPS24 FPS
medium20 FPS16 FPS
high16 FPS13 FPS
ultra12 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low221 FPS216 FPS
medium176 FPS173 FPS
high147 FPS144 FPS
ultra110 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low165 FPS162 FPS
medium132 FPS130 FPS
high110 FPS108 FPS
ultra83 FPS81 FPS
4K
low110 FPS108 FPS
medium88 FPS87 FPS
high74 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low183 FPS140 FPS
medium148 FPS111 FPS
high130 FPS92 FPS
ultra101 FPS74 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS101 FPS
medium107 FPS81 FPS
high94 FPS68 FPS
ultra69 FPS53 FPS
4K
low76 FPS60 FPS
medium58 FPS46 FPS
high47 FPS36 FPS
ultra31 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon Pro Vega 16

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
G3D Mark Score
4,901+2%
4,809
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1792+75%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+32%
2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+75%
64
L1 Cache
448 KB+75%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
UVD 3.2
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
254mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
80-11%
Perf/Watt
21.8
64.1+194%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($1999 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon Pro Vega 16
MSRP
$1999
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
Infinity
Codename
Tahiti
Vega 12
Release
August 7 2014
November 14 2018
Ranking
#446
#451