
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
FirePro S9050
2014Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro S9050 better than Radeon Pro Vega 16?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro Vega 16 make more sense than FirePro S9050?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon Pro Vega 16

FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901+2% | 4,809 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+75% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+32% | 2.437 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 254mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 64.1+194% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($1999 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | Vega 12 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #446 | #451 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












